Abstract:
The present work has the objective of informing lay individuals about their constitutional rights, in case it is later imposed that the implantation of the chip in Brazil is replaced by the current identification documents. In order to achieve the objectives of this work, the bibliographical research will be used, which will address doctrinal, journalistic and law-making positions on the subject, in response to the following problem: Does compulsory implantation of an identifier chip in humans hurt the individual's constitutional rights? The answer is positive, since it hurts constitutional rights, mainly because there is an effective and less invasive alternative in the identification, being this, the biometry that can perfectly replace the implantation of the chip.
