MEDIDAS PROTETIVAS DE URGÊNCIA: APLICAÇÕES ATUALMENTE E CONSEQUÊNCIAS

Abstract

The theme of the research is the unconstitutionality of the procedure, provided for in Law 11,340/2006. The general objective is to discuss the party indicted in the Urgent Protective Measure, and how their broad defense is hampered in most cases. It is known that the procedure has been widely used since its creation, being extremely beneficial for women victims of domestic violence, however, most urgent protective measures are imposed in bad faith, with the intention of simply causing inconvenience to the accused., whether due to betrayal, fight or revenge. Firstly, a little about the history of the Emergency Protective Measure will be analyzed, explaining its content and application, in the background, it will be discussed about its application today, pointing out the current progress of the procedure and possible errors in its application, since in the third plan, the objective of the work will be analyzed, which is to point out how the accused is harmed by not being able to defend himself, most of the time not knowing that the procedure against him exists and how this weapon in the hands of women can be used to cause damage to the accused.